M
MCP Directory CURATED DIRECTORY
911 MCP servers indexed
中文
← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionAgent SwarmA multi-agent orchestration operating system for companies.GitHub MCP ServerGitHub's official MCP server for managing repos, issues, PRs, and workflows via natural language
FMRS54 / 100 · D76 / 100 · B
Reliability8 / 2013 / 20
Security and permissions9 / 2014 / 20
Maintenance12 / 2018 / 20
Documentation14 / 2017 / 20
Setup experience11 / 2014 / 20
Best for
  • Teams seeking self-hosted multi-agent orchestration
  • Engineering and operations teams that want a lead agent to coordinate specialized workers
  • Organizations needing shared memory, persistent identity, workflows, or human approval gates
  • Users able to manage Docker, API keys, and agent-harness credentials
  • Teams that want an AI assistant to directly operate on GitHub repos and collaboration workflows
  • Users already in the GitHub Copilot ecosystem who want a zero-deployment remote option
Not for
  • Users who only need a single MCP tool or simple chat assistant
  • Environments that cannot run Docker or manage agent-harness credentials
  • Teams that do not want tasks to flow among multiple agents, shared memory, or external integrations
  • Users requiring documented compatibility with a ready-made desktop client
  • Scenarios where you don't want the assistant to have write access to repos (enable only read-only toolsets)
  • Environments with strict network isolation for private repos that can't reach the official remote endpoint
Required permissions
  • Access to the local or remote Agent Swarm MCP endpoint
  • An Agent Swarm API key supplied through an Authorization header with the Bearer prefix
  • The X-Agent-ID of a registered agent
  • Depending on enabled integrations and harnesses, credentials for Slack, code hosting, email, Linear, Jira, or other services
  • A personal access token (PAT) or OAuth App token; effective scope depends on the token's own permissions
  • Enabling toolsets like actions/issues/pull_requests grants write access — request tokens on a least-privilege basis
Risks and side effects
  • Worker agents execute tasks in isolated Docker environments but may access the code, files, and services configured for them
  • Shared memory retains learnings across sessions and can broaden the context visible to later tasks
  • Enabled integrations can cause messages, emails, ticket updates, code changes, or pull requests
  • Misconfigured API keys, Bearer headers, or agent IDs can cause connection failures or access to the wrong agent instance
  • Automated workflows and external actions should be reviewed with human approval gates, especially for irreversible operations
  • Write toolsets (creating/merging PRs, triggering workflows) can cause accidental changes if the token is overscoped — try a read-only toolset first
  • In hosted mode, credentials travel via the Authorization header — make sure the client-to-api.githubcopilot.com connection is trusted
Supported clientsClaude Desktop, Claude Code, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains IDEs, Zed, Amp
Tools015