M
MCP Directory CURATED DIRECTORY
911 MCP servers indexed
中文
← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionForm.io Agentic Coding ToolsetMCP server, Claude Code plugin, and AI skills library for building Form.io applications.MartinLoop MCP ServerAn independent control layer that gives AI coding agents budgets, brakes, and receipts
FMRS62 / 100 · C79 / 100 · B
Reliability10 / 2012 / 20
Security and permissions13 / 2018 / 20
Maintenance11 / 2016 / 20
Documentation15 / 2018 / 20
Setup experience13 / 2015 / 20
Best for
  • Developers using Form.io to build form applications within AI coding environments
  • Enterprises needing standardized data, RBAC, and audit capabilities
  • Teams using Claude Code or other MCP-aware clients
  • Engineering teams scaling AI coding agents while controlling spend
  • Platform teams that need auditable, rollback-aware agent execution records
  • Organizations using multiple agents (Claude, Codex, Gemini) under one governed flow
Not for
  • Developers not using the Form.io platform
  • Users seeking no-code development without AI coding tools
  • Scenarios requiring direct REST API access without MCP tool abstraction
  • Developers who just want a simple code-completion helper without run governance
  • Teams unwilling to accept local JSONL run records with HMAC signing
  • Environments without a supported adapter (Claude/Codex/Gemini CLIs, direct provider, or verifier-only)
Required permissions
  • Requires Form.io project API key or browser login authentication
  • Access to Form.io project URL and base URL
  • Ability to create, update, delete forms, roles, actions, and project resources
  • Read/write access to the configured repo root (writable scope restrictable via --allow-path/--deny-path)
  • Ability to invoke the chosen agent CLI (Claude/Codex/Gemini, etc.) and its underlying model account
  • Local disk writes for run records, receipts, and share outputs (share/run-receipt., etc.)
  • Execution of user-configured verifier commands (e.g. npm test)
Risks and side effects
  • API key leakage could lead to unauthorized access
  • Importing project templates may overwrite existing items with the same machine name
  • Browser login flow may fail in CI or environments without a display
  • Using insecure TLS settings (FORMIO_INSECURE_TLS) may pose a security risk
  • Verifier commands are executed; poorly chosen verifier commands carry security risk despite preflight policy checks
  • Cost and token figures may be estimates (labeled with provenance) and should not be treated as settled accounting
  • Receipt integrity must be verified before use as trustworthy evidence; missing rollback evidence is flagged as EVIDENCE_BOUNDARY
  • Policy defaults come from martin.config.yaml and can be overridden by CLI flags; misconfiguration can loosen safety boundaries
Supported clientsClaude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, ClineClaude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, VS Code, GitHub Copilot, Continue
Tools200