← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionFilesystem MCP ServerLocal project-file access over stdio.Safe Docx MCP ServerAI-native surgical editing of Word and OpenDocument files with formatting preservation
FMRS35 / 100 · D68 / 100 · C
Reliability6 / 208 / 20
Security and permissions6 / 2016 / 20
Maintenance11 / 2014 / 20
Documentation5 / 2018 / 20
Setup experience7 / 2012 / 20
Best for
  • Developers who need an MCP client to access a specified Claude Code project directory.
  • Developers who need precise, format-preserving edits to .docx/.odt files via coding agents
  • Workflows that require tracked-changes output for human review
Not for
  • Users who need database access or custom API tools.
  • Users who need remote deployment, SSE, or streamable-http transport.
  • Visual editing scenarios needing browser rendering, real-time collaboration, or pixel-level pagination guarantees
  • Using .dotx templates directly (they must be converted to .docx first)
Required permissions
  • Access to the local project directory specified by ${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR}.
  • The exact read/write scope depends on the client, operating system, and server implementation; the source does not specify it.
  • Filesystem access to read and write local .docx / .odt documents
Risks and side effects
  • The MCP server may access local files; specify only a directory you are willing to authorize.
  • The README warns that MCP servers, files, or other software included in plugins may not be controlled by Anthropic and are not guaranteed to work as intended or avoid making changes.
  • Edits apply to local files; incorrect targeted changes could overwrite original content — use the clean/tracked-changes dual output for review
  • The project is not a visual editor or layout engine, so complex layout results should be verified manually
Supported clients
Tools00