← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionTalk to FigmaLet AI agents read, analyze, and modify Figma designsAtlassian Rovo MCP ServerSecurely connect Atlassian Cloud to AI tools.Notion MCP ServerOfficial Notion MCP server for querying, editing, and managing Notion pages and databases via AI agents.
FMRS53 / 100 · D66 / 100 · C64 / 100 · C
Reliability8 / 208 / 208 / 20
Security and permissions10 / 2015 / 2017 / 20
Maintenance11 / 2015 / 2010 / 20
Documentation13 / 2015 / 2016 / 20
Setup experience11 / 2013 / 2013 / 20
Best for
  • UX/UI teams: Automate repetitive design tasks and maintain brand consistency
  • Developers: Generate production-ready code directly from designs
  • Teams that need a free Figma account alternative
  • Developers, content creators, and project teams using Atlassian Cloud
  • Teams that want Atlassian access inside ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, or VS Code
  • Users who need natural-language search, write, and cross-product workflows
  • Teams and individuals who already manage docs/wikis in Notion and want AI clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor, etc.) to operate on that content directly
  • Developers who want to self-host a local MCP server rather than use a remote hosted option
  • Automation/agent workflows that need to query or update Notion database records programmatically
Not for
  • Users needing full support for Figma Variables (still in development)
  • Users needing advanced export to Tailwind CSS/SwiftUI (coming soon)
  • Users without an Atlassian Cloud site or relevant product permissions
  • Deployments requiring a self-hosted MCP server
  • Users unwilling to grant an AI client access to Atlassian data or actions
  • Jira Service Management or Bitbucket Cloud workflows requiring OAuth authentication
  • Users who want the standard-OAuth, zero-JSON-config install with active official support — Notion recommends its newer remote Notion MCP server for that
  • Users uncomfortable handing a Notion integration token to a locally-run LLM client
  • Use cases needing capabilities the integration deliberately excludes, such as deleting databases
  • Long-term production deployments that need guaranteed maintenance, given this repo may be sunset
Required permissions
  • Requires Node.js and Figma Desktop
  • Requires network access to run npx and connect WebSocket
  • Requires installing the Figma plugin and granting it access to the current design file
  • AI tool must be configured to connect to the MCP server
  • Jira and Confluence provide read, write, and search permission groups
  • Jira Service Management provides read and write access through API tokens only
  • Bitbucket Cloud provides read and write access through scoped API tokens only
  • Compass is available through OAuth 2.1 only
  • The first OAuth installer for a site must have access to the Atlassian apps requested by the MCP scopes
  • Organization administrators can manage domain controls, API-token authentication, app access, and audit logs
  • A Notion internal integration token (NOTION_TOKEN or the Authorization value in OPENAPI_MCP_HEADERS), scoped by that integration's Capabilities (can be limited to read-only)
  • Access limited to the specific pages/databases explicitly connected to the integration, not the whole workspace
  • A separate bearer auth token when using the Streamable HTTP transport (--auth-token / AUTH_TOKEN)
  • Network access to the Notion API
Risks and side effects
  • Multiple agents modifying the document simultaneously may cause conflicts, though the server has a command queue, it's recommended to explicitly specify the parentId parameter
  • There may be undiscovered bugs as the project is under active development
  • Dependencies on third-party npm packages and Figma plugins; ensure sources are trusted
  • AI clients can perform Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management, Bitbucket, and Compass actions on the user’s behalf
  • Prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, and tool-poisoning attacks may cause data exfiltration or unintended changes
  • Use least privilege, scoped tokens, and minimal project or workspace access
  • Require human confirmation for high-impact or destructive actions and monitor audit logs
  • If the integration is granted broad read/write capabilities and connected to many pages, that content is effectively exposed to the LLM, risking data leakage or unintended edits
  • Running with --unsafe-disable-auth removes bearer authentication on the HTTP transport, potentially making it reachable via DNS rebinding from pages a user visits — the README says to only use it on an isolated network
  • Multi-tenant token passthrough requires careful TLS/gateway configuration; misconfiguration risks leaking or misrouting Notion tokens between tenants
  • The README states this local server may be sunset in favor of the remote Notion MCP, and that issues/PRs here are not actively monitored, so long-term maintenance and security fixes are not guaranteed
  • Storing NOTION_TOKEN or OPENAPI_MCP_HEADERS directly in shared client config files risks leaking the secret
Supported clientsClaude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, GitHub Copilot, Antigravity, Cline, Roo CodeOpenAI ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, Visual Studio Code (GitHub Copilot), GitHub Copilot CLI, Google Gemini CLI, Amazon Quick Suite, Local MCP-compatible clients via mcp-remoteClaude Desktop, Cursor, Zed, GitHub Copilot CLI
Tools1909