M
MCP Directory CURATED DIRECTORY
911 MCP servers indexed
中文
← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionAsk Codex MCP ServerBridge Claude to the OpenAI Codex CLI for code review and a second opinion from another model.GitHub MCP ServerGitHub's official MCP server for managing repos, issues, PRs, and workflows via natural language
FMRS52 / 100 · D76 / 100 · B
Reliability8 / 2013 / 20
Security and permissions11 / 2014 / 20
Maintenance10 / 2018 / 20
Documentation12 / 2017 / 20
Setup experience11 / 2014 / 20
Best for
  • Developers already using the OpenAI Codex CLI who want to reuse its quota
  • Teams that want cross-model second opinions inside Claude Code, Cursor, or similar assistants
  • Reasoning-heavy code reviews and architecture critique on specific files
  • Teams that want an AI assistant to directly operate on GitHub repos and collaboration workflows
  • Users already in the GitHub Copilot ecosystem who want a zero-deployment remote option
Not for
  • Users without an OpenAI/Codex account or unable to install the Codex CLI
  • Anyone needing fully offline, zero-cost review (use the Ollama provider instead)
  • Users who need 1M+ token whole-codebase reads (use the Gemini or Antigravity provider)
  • Users expecting persisted per-session or cross-session usage accounting (usage stats are in-memory only)
  • Scenarios where you don't want the assistant to have write access to repos (enable only read-only toolsets)
  • Environments with strict network isolation for private repos that can't reach the official remote endpoint
Required permissions
  • Execute the Codex CLI locally and use network access to reach Codex services
  • Read the files being reviewed and send their contents to the Codex CLI as prompts
  • Write MCP server configuration into client config files/directories
  • Optionally read the GMCPT_TIMEOUT_MS and GMCPT_LOG_LEVEL environment variables
  • A personal access token (PAT) or OAuth App token; effective scope depends on the token's own permissions
  • Enabling toolsets like actions/issues/pull_requests grants write access — request tokens on a least-privilege basis
Risks and side effects
  • Reviewed code is sent to the remote service behind the Codex CLI, which may conflict with data-egress policies
  • Codex CLI model and quota behavior is controlled upstream; documented defaults (gpt-6-astra → gpt-5.6-terra) can change
  • Omitting sessionId: "" on the first call yields a non-resumable one-shot session, which can be confusing
  • Unofficial third-party tool with no affiliation with or endorsement by Anthropic, OpenAI, or other vendors
  • Long reviews can exceed the default 5-minute timeout and be cut off
  • Write toolsets (creating/merging PRs, triggering workflows) can cause accidental changes if the token is overscoped — try a read-only toolset first
  • In hosted mode, credentials travel via the Authorization header — make sure the client-to-api.githubcopilot.com connection is trusted
Supported clientsClaude Code, Cursor, Codex, Claude DesktopClaude Desktop, Claude Code, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains IDEs, Zed, Amp
Tools115