M
MCP Directory CURATED DIRECTORY
911 MCP servers indexed
中文
← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionAnalook MCP ServerUnderstand any competitor in 30 seconds — competitor intelligence for AI agentsFirecrawl MCP ServerFirecrawl's official MCP server for web search, scraping, and structured extraction for AI agents
FMRS55 / 100 · C75 / 100 · B
Reliability9 / 2013 / 20
Security and permissions12 / 2012 / 20
Maintenance8 / 2016 / 20
Documentation13 / 2017 / 20
Setup experience13 / 2017 / 20
Best for
  • Indie hackers who want competitor intelligence callable directly by an agent
  • Growth teams benchmarking against competitors
  • Investors doing quick pre-DD intelligence gathering
  • Founders preparing a launch in a crowded market
  • Scenarios needing clean, structured web context fed to an AI assistant
  • Users already on the Firecrawl platform who want to call its scraping capability directly via MCP
Not for
  • Teams requiring fully offline or self-hosted deployment with no data sent to third-party services
  • Self-hosted setups that cannot supply third-party API keys (such as DataForSEO, Apify, Product Hunt, and LLM providers)
  • Users expecting non-public internal data (this tool works from public signals only)
  • Clients that only support local stdio MCP processes and not remote HTTP MCP
  • Simple static-page scraping where you don't want to depend on a third-party API and incur call costs
  • Sites that explicitly disallow automated access (robots.txt)
Required permissions
  • Requires a valid Analook access token (Bearer token) for remote MCP authentication
  • Analysis depends on third-party data-source API keys (DataForSEO, Apify, Product Hunt, TeamoRouter, DeepSeek)
  • Server-side use of Supabase for auth, credits, and report storage
  • Requires a Firecrawl API key to call; cost and quota are governed by the Firecrawl account
  • firecrawl_agent/firecrawl_interact perform automated browser interaction, which may trigger login or form-submission flows on the target site
Risks and side effects
  • Reports are generated by third-party LLM and data services and may contain inaccurate or outdated information; verify key conclusions manually
  • Results are inferred from public signals, and business-model or revenue estimates are ranges and hypotheses only
  • Requests are sent to the remote service https://www.analook.com/mcp/, so data-transfer and compliance requirements should be assessed
  • A leaked token may allow others to consume your account credits
  • The repository declares no license metadata (the README states MIT); confirm authorization before commercial use
  • Bulk crawl/map tools can generate significant request volume against a target site — respect the site's rate limits and terms of service
  • firecrawl_agent's interactive action chain is longer — define task boundaries clearly before running it to avoid accidentally triggering actions on a sensitive site
Supported clientsClaude Desktop, CursorClaude Desktop, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Zed, Amp
Tools511