| FMRS | 49 / 100 · D | 75 / 100 · B |
| Reliability | 8 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
|---|
| Security and permissions | 7 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
|---|
| Maintenance | 12 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
|---|
| Documentation | 13 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
|---|
| Setup experience | 9 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Best for | - Enterprise agent teams that need governable, auditable policies
- Developers who want a generalist agent they only configure with domain tools and policies
- Hybrid workflows that must combine browser interaction with API calls
- Teams using the Python SDK or self-hosting on Kubernetes
| - Individuals or teams who prioritise privacy and offline operation and do not want data leaving the machine
- Users who share memory across multiple MCP clients such as Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, Cursor, Codex and Gemini CLI
- Scenarios that need encrypted storage, a hash-chained audit log and verifiable vault migration
- Users who want low-latency recall, a bundled embedding model and no extra LLM calls inside the memory layer
|
| Not for | - Lightweight scenarios that only need a single simple tool call
- Offline users who cannot supply any LLM API key or self-hosted model
- End users expecting zero-configuration out-of-the-box use
| - Users who need cloud multi-device sync or a hosted team memory service; moving between machines means locking the vault and copying the file
- Users who expect the server itself to run an LLM that extracts facts and decides what to remember; Compartment explicitly keeps no LLM inside and leaves that to the host model
- Users who cannot keep a passphrase safe or who need a recovery path if it is lost, since Compartment never generates a password, seed or recovery phrase
- Deployments that require network transports such as SSE or streamable-http; this server is stdio only and opens no ports
|
| Required permissions | - Reading the repository and local workspace files (e.g. files under cuga_workspace)
- Network access to LLM providers, OpenAPI services, and MCP servers
- In hybrid/web mode, controlling browser pages through the browser extension and Playwright
- Accessing Docker/Podman or E2B cloud execution environments when sandboxing is enabled
- In manage mode, drafting and publishing agent configuration (tools, MCP, LLM, policies)
| - Read and write the vault file under the user's home directory, by default ~/.compartment/memory.vault, and its sibling settings file
- Access the session directory holding the unlock credential (configurable with COMPARTMENT_SESSION_DIR), which also carries the shared embedding process's Unix socket
- Optionally use the macOS keychain (compartment unlock --keychain is an explicit opt-in, and it survives reboots)
- Write or merge an mcpServers entry into each MCP client's own configuration file, taking a byte-exact backup first
- Install a PostToolUse hook for Claude Code that captures memory files the agent writes
- Serve a read-only dashboard on 127.0.0.1 behind a one-time random URL token
|
| Risks and side effects | - The agent can call real APIs and act on web pages on the user's behalf, so mistakes can have real business impact
- Misconfigured policies or sandboxes weaken isolation; local Python execution is the default and is less isolated
- Exposing the local registry to E2B via tunnels such as ngrok increases the attack surface
- The knowledge base and saved trajectories may contain sensitive enterprise data that you must store and access-control yourself
- Runs against self-hosted or internal models, so token and cost accounting must be converted with your own rates
| - A leaked passphrase means the encrypted content can be decrypted; Compartment generates no recovery phrase and cannot recover a lost passphrase
- Enabling the memory_unlock tool places the passphrase in the model's context, which is why it is off by default
- If a 2FA keyfile is lost, for example a USB stick, the vault cannot be opened even with the passphrase
- `export --plaintext` writes the vault as unencrypted JSONL, so that file must be handled carefully
- Memory content can come from untrusted sources; recall wraps memories with a notice that they are stored data and content can be marked quarantined, but the host agent must still treat memory as data to limit prompt-injection risk
- The capture hook and client integration write into the user's own settings files, although the implementation backs up and merges rather than replacing
|
| Supported clients | CUGA SDK, MCP | Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, Cursor, VS Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cline, Roo Code, Zed, OpenCode, LM Studio, AnythingLLM, BoltAI, Goose, Kiro |
| Tools | 2 | 14 |