M
MCP Directory CURATED DIRECTORY
911 MCP servers indexed
中文
← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionMCP AppsSpec and SDK for embedding interactive UIs inside MCP tool calls.GitHub MCP ServerGitHub's official MCP server for managing repos, issues, PRs, and workflows via natural language
FMRS60 / 100 · C76 / 100 · B
Reliability8 / 2013 / 20
Security and permissions12 / 2014 / 20
Maintenance12 / 2018 / 20
Documentation15 / 2017 / 20
Setup experience13 / 2014 / 20
Best for
  • MCP server developers who need rich interactive UI inside tool call results
  • Teams already using hosts that support the MCP Apps extension (Claude, ChatGPT, VS Code, Goose, Postman)
  • Developers who want official spec-compliant starter templates across multiple front-end frameworks (React, Vue, Svelte, Preact, Solid, vanilla JS)
  • Teams that want an AI assistant to directly operate on GitHub repos and collaboration workflows
  • Users already in the GitHub Copilot ecosystem who want a zero-deployment remote option
Not for
  • Users looking for a single ready-to-use MCP server/tool — this repo is a protocol spec, SDK, and example collection, not one server
  • Setups where the client host doesn't support the MCP Apps extension (README states host support varies)
  • Anyone needing a production-supported, officially maintained host implementation — README explicitly says there's no supported host in the repo beyond the reference basic-host example
  • Scenarios where you don't want the assistant to have write access to repos (enable only read-only toolsets)
  • Environments with strict network isolation for private repos that can't reach the official remote endpoint
Required permissions
  • The spec/SDK itself carries no inherent permissions; specific permissions depend on which example server is used (e.g., the system-monitor example reads local OS metrics, the video-resource example serves binary media resources)
  • README does not provide a complete permissions manifest for any single server
  • A personal access token (PAT) or OAuth App token; effective scope depends on the token's own permissions
  • Enabling toolsets like actions/issues/pull_requests grants write access — request tokens on a least-privilege basis
Risks and side effects
  • UI content runs as server-supplied HTML inside a sandboxed iframe on the host — the actual isolation and trust boundary depend on the specific host implementation, not on this repo
  • The spec has both a stable 2026-01-26 version and an actively developed draft version, so interfaces may change as the spec evolves
  • License labeling is inconsistent — the README badge shows Apache 2.0 while the repo's catalog metadata records NOASSERTION — verify actual license terms before use
  • Write toolsets (creating/merging PRs, triggering workflows) can cause accidental changes if the token is overscoped — try a read-only toolset first
  • In hosted mode, credentials travel via the Authorization header — make sure the client-to-api.githubcopilot.com connection is trusted
Supported clientsClaude Desktop, Claude Code, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains IDEs, Zed, Amp
Tools015