← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionGoogle Workspace MCPControl Google Workspace with natural language.Atlassian Rovo MCP ServerSecurely connect Atlassian Cloud to AI tools.Notion MCP ServerOfficial Notion MCP server for querying, editing, and managing Notion pages and databases via AI agents.
FMRS56 / 100 · C66 / 100 · C64 / 100 · C
Reliability8 / 208 / 208 / 20
Security and permissions10 / 2015 / 2017 / 20
Maintenance12 / 2015 / 2010 / 20
Documentation14 / 2015 / 2016 / 20
Setup experience12 / 2013 / 2013 / 20
Best for
  • Individuals and teams needing access to several Google Workspace services.
  • Developers deploying by tool tier, service, or permission scope.
  • Organizations needing self-hosted, multi-user OAuth 2.1, or container deployments.
  • Developers who want to call MCP tools through a CLI.
  • Developers, content creators, and project teams using Atlassian Cloud
  • Teams that want Atlassian access inside ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, or VS Code
  • Users who need natural-language search, write, and cross-product workflows
  • Teams and individuals who already manage docs/wikis in Notion and want AI clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor, etc.) to operate on that content directly
  • Developers who want to self-host a local MCP server rather than use a remote hosted option
  • Automation/agent workflows that need to query or update Notion database records programmatically
Not for
  • Users requiring a server maintained by Google.
  • Users with only a personal @gmail.com account who need Google Chat.
  • Users unwilling to configure Google Cloud OAuth credentials or APIs.
  • Applications seeking unauthorized access to Google Workspace data.
  • Users without an Atlassian Cloud site or relevant product permissions
  • Deployments requiring a self-hosted MCP server
  • Users unwilling to grant an AI client access to Atlassian data or actions
  • Jira Service Management or Bitbucket Cloud workflows requiring OAuth authentication
  • Users who want the standard-OAuth, zero-JSON-config install with active official support — Notion recommends its newer remote Notion MCP server for that
  • Users uncomfortable handing a Notion integration token to a locally-run LLM client
  • Use cases needing capabilities the integration deliberately excludes, such as deleting databases
  • Long-term production deployments that need guaranteed maintenance, given this repo may be sunset
Required permissions
  • Requires Google Cloud OAuth client credentials.
  • OAuth scopes depend on the enabled services and tools.
  • Supports read-only scopes, per-service granular permissions, and full access.
  • Write tools for Drive, Gmail, and other services require corresponding write permissions.
  • Google Chat requires a configured Chat app and a Google Workspace account.
  • Optional service-account mode requires service-account credentials and domain-wide delegation.
  • Jira and Confluence provide read, write, and search permission groups
  • Jira Service Management provides read and write access through API tokens only
  • Bitbucket Cloud provides read and write access through scoped API tokens only
  • Compass is available through OAuth 2.1 only
  • The first OAuth installer for a site must have access to the Atlassian apps requested by the MCP scopes
  • Organization administrators can manage domain controls, API-token authentication, app access, and audit logs
  • A Notion internal integration token (NOTION_TOKEN or the Authorization value in OPENAPI_MCP_HEADERS), scoped by that integration's Capabilities (can be limited to read-only)
  • Access limited to the specific pages/databases explicitly connected to the integration, not the whole workspace
  • A separate bearer auth token when using the Streamable HTTP transport (--auth-token / AUTH_TOKEN)
  • Network access to the Notion API
Risks and side effects
  • Full tools and write scopes may allow modifying, sending, deleting, or sharing user data.
  • For public deployments, unrestricted dynamic-client redirect URIs can create a phishing risk.
  • Stdio is a legacy fallback; OAuth 2.1 is recommended for remote or shared deployments.
  • Local attachments and credential stores write to configured local directories; stateless mode avoids file writes.
  • Google API quotas, OAuth consent configuration, and account permissions may limit functionality.
  • The Chat API is unavailable for personal Gmail accounts.
  • AI clients can perform Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management, Bitbucket, and Compass actions on the user’s behalf
  • Prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, and tool-poisoning attacks may cause data exfiltration or unintended changes
  • Use least privilege, scoped tokens, and minimal project or workspace access
  • Require human confirmation for high-impact or destructive actions and monitor audit logs
  • If the integration is granted broad read/write capabilities and connected to many pages, that content is effectively exposed to the LLM, risking data leakage or unintended edits
  • Running with --unsafe-disable-auth removes bearer authentication on the HTTP transport, potentially making it reachable via DNS rebinding from pages a user visits — the README says to only use it on an isolated network
  • Multi-tenant token passthrough requires careful TLS/gateway configuration; misconfiguration risks leaking or misrouting Notion tokens between tenants
  • The README states this local server may be sunset in favor of the remote Notion MCP, and that issues/PRs here are not actively monitored, so long-term maintenance and security fixes are not guaranteed
  • Storing NOTION_TOKEN or OPENAPI_MCP_HEADERS directly in shared client config files risks leaking the secret
Supported clientsClaude Desktop, Claude Code, VS Code, LM StudioOpenAI ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, Visual Studio Code (GitHub Copilot), GitHub Copilot CLI, Google Gemini CLI, Amazon Quick Suite, Local MCP-compatible clients via mcp-remoteClaude Desktop, Cursor, Zed, GitHub Copilot CLI
Tools2909