M
MCP Directory CURATED DIRECTORY
911 MCP servers indexed
中文
← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionMantishackAn autonomous vulnerability-discovery agent for authorized security testing.Firecrawl MCP ServerFirecrawl's official MCP server for web search, scraping, and structured extraction for AI agents
FMRS49 / 100 · D75 / 100 · B
Reliability8 / 2013 / 20
Security and permissions10 / 2012 / 20
Maintenance8 / 2016 / 20
Documentation13 / 2017 / 20
Setup experience10 / 2017 / 20
Best for
  • Security researchers with explicit authorization.
  • AppSec teams combining automated detection with attacker-simulation validation.
  • Technical users comfortable with an incomplete harness and external tool dependencies.
  • Scenarios needing clean, structured web context fed to an AI assistant
  • Users already on the Firecrawl platform who want to call its scraping capability directly via MCP
Not for
  • Testing targets without authorization.
  • Users seeking a polished, complete commercial security platform.
  • Users expecting fabricated results when external scanners are unavailable.
  • Simple static-page scraping where you don't want to depend on a third-party API and incur call costs
  • Sites that explicitly disallow automated access (robots.txt)
Required permissions
  • Requires access to read and analyze the target codebase.
  • Depending on enabled capabilities, may invoke local scanners, solvers, and the CodeQL CLI.
  • Authorization must be established before active or exploit testing; otherwise restrict runs to read-only static analysis.
  • Requires a Firecrawl API key to call; cost and quota are governed by the Firecrawl account
  • firecrawl_agent/firecrawl_interact perform automated browser interaction, which may trigger login or form-submission flows on the target site
Risks and side effects
  • Gated exploitation is off by default, but active testing can still affect a target.
  • Missing underlying binaries make corresponding scanning capabilities unavailable.
  • The project describes itself as rough, with known gaps and unfinished external toolchains.
  • CodeQL in particular does not permit commercial use; licenses for all invoked components should be reviewed.
  • Bulk crawl/map tools can generate significant request volume against a target site — respect the site's rate limits and terms of service
  • firecrawl_agent's interactive action chain is longer — define task boundaries clearly before running it to avoid accidentally triggering actions on a sensitive site
Supported clientsClaude Desktop, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Zed, Amp
Tools1411