M
MCP Directory CURATED DIRECTORY
911 MCP servers indexed
中文
← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionMCP HandlerEasily spin up an MCP server on Next.js, Nuxt, Svelte, and moreGitHub MCP ServerGitHub's official MCP server for managing repos, issues, PRs, and workflows via natural language
FMRS57 / 100 · C76 / 100 · B
Reliability9 / 2013 / 20
Security and permissions11 / 2014 / 20
Maintenance12 / 2018 / 20
Documentation13 / 2017 / 20
Setup experience12 / 2014 / 20
Best for
  • Developers working in JavaScript/TypeScript with Fetch-compatible frameworks
  • Teams wanting one handler that serves both new and legacy MCP clients
  • Stateless, per-request deployments that do not need Redis sessions
  • Projects needing RFC 9728 / RFC 8414 compliant authorization surfaces
  • Teams that want an AI assistant to directly operate on GitHub repos and collaboration workflows
  • Users already in the GitHub Copilot ecosystem who want a zero-deployment remote option
Not for
  • Frameworks built on Node.js IncomingMessage/ServerResponse such as Express without a Web Request adapter
  • Projects still on @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 1.x (use mcp-handler 1.x instead)
  • Deployments requiring the HTTP+SSE (2024-11-05) transport, removed in 2.x
  • Environments running Node.js below 20
  • Scenarios where you don't want the assistant to have write access to repos (enable only read-only toolsets)
  • Environments with strict network isolation for private repos that can't reach the official remote endpoint
Required permissions
  • Access to the exposed HTTP route
  • Access to the authorization server that issues bearer tokens
  • Ability to configure protected resource metadata endpoints
  • Network access from the deployment to the authorization server when verifying tokens
  • A personal access token (PAT) or OAuth App token; effective scope depends on the token's own permissions
  • Enabling toolsets like actions/issues/pull_requests grants write access — request tokens on a least-privilege basis
Risks and side effects
  • Exposing the MCP handler publicly without auth can let arbitrary callers invoke registered tools
  • Tool return content flows into the model context, so sensitive data could leak
  • 2.x is stateless, so GET/DELETE session operations return 405 and session-dependent clients may misbehave
  • Migrating from 1.x is a breaking change (full Standard Schema for inputSchema, removal of variadic methods, ctx.http?.authInfo), and improper upgrades cause runtime errors
  • Write toolsets (creating/merging PRs, triggering workflows) can cause accidental changes if the token is overscoped — try a read-only toolset first
  • In hosted mode, credentials travel via the Authorization header — make sure the client-to-api.githubcopilot.com connection is trusted
Supported clientsClaude Desktop, Cursor, WindsurfClaude Desktop, Claude Code, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains IDEs, Zed, Amp
Tools115