M
MCP Directory CURATED DIRECTORY
911 MCP servers indexed
中文
← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionMCP Ts CoreBuilding MCP servers with TypeScript infrastructure handled.MartinLoop MCP ServerAn independent control layer that gives AI coding agents budgets, brakes, and receipts
FMRS43 / 100 · D79 / 100 · B
Reliability5 / 2012 / 20
Security and permissions8 / 2018 / 20
Maintenance10 / 2016 / 20
Documentation12 / 2018 / 20
Setup experience8 / 2015 / 20
Best for
  • Development teams using TypeScript
  • Building production-grade MCP servers quickly
  • Needing streamable HTTP or stdio transports
  • Requiring OpenTelemetry observability
  • Engineering teams scaling AI coding agents while controlling spend
  • Platform teams that need auditable, rollback-aware agent execution records
  • Organizations using multiple agents (Claude, Codex, Gemini) under one governed flow
Not for
  • End-users who don't want to write code
  • Those needing a pre-defined set of business tools
  • Simple JSON-RPC services without framework overhead
  • Developers who just want a simple code-completion helper without run governance
  • Teams unwilling to accept local JSONL run records with HMAC signing
  • Environments without a supported adapter (Claude/Codex/Gemini CLIs, direct provider, or verifier-only)
Required permissions
  • Access to environment variables for configuration
  • May access filesystem (for storage) or network (for external APIs)
  • If using Supabase or Cloudflare D1/KV/R2, those credentials are needed
  • Read/write access to the configured repo root (writable scope restrictable via --allow-path/--deny-path)
  • Ability to invoke the chosen agent CLI (Claude/Codex/Gemini, etc.) and its underlying model account
  • Local disk writes for run records, receipts, and share outputs (share/run-receipt., etc.)
  • Execution of user-configured verifier commands (e.g. npm test)
Risks and side effects
  • Dependency on external services (like Supabase) introduces security risks
  • Misconfigured setups may expose the wrong transport (e.g., HTTP when stdio intended)
  • OpenTelemetry may generate additional network traffic
  • Verifier commands are executed; poorly chosen verifier commands carry security risk despite preflight policy checks
  • Cost and token figures may be estimates (labeled with provenance) and should not be treated as settled accounting
  • Receipt integrity must be verified before use as trustworthy evidence; missing rollback evidence is flagged as EVIDENCE_BOUNDARY
  • Policy defaults come from martin.config.yaml and can be overridden by CLI flags; misconfiguration can loosen safety boundaries
Supported clientsClaude Desktop, Claude CodeClaude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, VS Code, GitHub Copilot, Continue
Tools00