← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionMCPProxyLocal-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savingsMartinLoop MCP ServerAn independent control layer that gives AI coding agents budgets, brakes, and receipts
FMRS62 / 100 · C79 / 100 · B
Reliability8 / 2012 / 20
Security and permissions12 / 2018 / 20
Maintenance13 / 2016 / 20
Documentation16 / 2018 / 20
Setup experience13 / 2015 / 20
Best for
  • Developers and teams that need a unified, secure entry point in front of many MCP servers
  • Security-conscious users worried about Tool Poisoning Attacks who want new servers quarantined by default
  • AI agent users limited by context windows or client tool caps who want large token savings
  • Engineering teams scaling AI coding agents while controlling spend
  • Platform teams that need auditable, rollback-aware agent execution records
  • Organizations using multiple agents (Claude, Codex, Gemini) under one governed flow
Not for
  • Users who want a fully cloud-hosted setup and will not run a local proxy
  • Lightweight setups connecting only one or two simple MCP servers where discovery, quarantine and auditing add no value
  • Environments where running a Go binary or local service is not possible
  • Developers who just want a simple code-completion helper without run governance
  • Teams unwilling to accept local JSONL run records with HMAC signing
  • Environments without a supported adapter (Claude/Codex/Gemini CLIs, direct provider, or verifier-only)
Required permissions
  • Read and write the local config directory ~/.mcpproxy/ (mcp_config.json, certificates, activity logs)
  • Listen on a local HTTP port (127.0.0.1:8080 by default)
  • Spawn local stdio upstream MCP servers using the commands in your configuration
  • Connect to remote HTTP upstream servers as configured, potentially including OAuth login
  • If HTTPS is enabled, add a self-signed CA certificate to the system keychain via mcpproxy trust-cert
  • If third-party scanners are enabled, a working Docker environment is required
  • Read/write access to the configured repo root (writable scope restrictable via --allow-path/--deny-path)
  • Ability to invoke the chosen agent CLI (Claude/Codex/Gemini, etc.) and its underlying model account
  • Local disk writes for run records, receipts, and share outputs (share/run-receipt., etc.)
  • Execution of user-configured verifier commands (e.g. npm test)
Risks and side effects
  • The proxy becomes the single channel for all upstream tools, so a misconfiguration could expose tools the agent should not reach
  • The proxy inspects tool arguments and responses for sensitive data, and sensitive content may end up in the local activity log
  • Quarantine blocks new servers, but an already-approved server that later changes still requires re-approval (the README notes tool changes trigger blocking)
  • Spawning stdio upstreams means the proxy can execute the commands in your config, so the config source must be trusted
  • HTTPS uses self-signed certificates that must be manually trusted, otherwise clients fail to connect
  • Verifier commands are executed; poorly chosen verifier commands carry security risk despite preflight policy checks
  • Cost and token figures may be estimates (labeled with provenance) and should not be treated as settled accounting
  • Receipt integrity must be verified before use as trustworthy evidence; missing rollback evidence is flagged as EVIDENCE_BOUNDARY
  • Policy defaults come from martin.config.yaml and can be overridden by CLI flags; misconfiguration can loosen safety boundaries
Supported clientsCursor, Claude Desktop, VS Code, GooseClaude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, VS Code, GitHub Copilot, Continue
Tools50