M
MCP Directory CURATED DIRECTORY
911 MCP servers indexed
中文
← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionNeuroLinkThe TypeScript pipe layer for the AI nervous system.NPM Sentinel MCP ServerAI-powered NPM package analysis MCP server
FMRS46 / 100 · D79 / 100 · B
Reliability8 / 2012 / 20
Security and permissions8 / 2016 / 20
Maintenance10 / 2018 / 20
Documentation11 / 2018 / 20
Setup experience9 / 2015 / 20
Best for
  • TypeScript teams needing a unified API across multiple AI providers
  • Applications requiring MCP integration, RAG, memory, or provider failover
  • Developers who want both an SDK and a professional CLI
  • Developers auditing NPM dependencies within AI workflows
  • Teams performing supply chain security assessments
  • Users of Claude Desktop, Cursor, or VS Code
Not for
  • Users seeking a standalone MCP server with a verified tool manifest and transport
  • Users unwilling to configure AI provider credentials
  • Simple MCP use cases that do not need a TypeScript SDK, CLI, or multi-provider features
  • Projects outside the NPM ecosystem (e.g., pure Python/Go)
  • Environments without network access to deps.dev, OSV.dev, and the npm registry
  • Scenarios requiring maintenance by an official upstream vendor
Required permissions
  • API credentials for configured AI providers
  • Appropriate local file read permissions when processing files
  • File write permissions when using the built-in writeFile tool
  • Tokens, environment variables, or authorization required by connected external MCP servers
  • ffmpeg or bundled ffmpeg-static may be required for video processing
  • Network access to the NPM registry and external services (deps.dev, OSV.dev, OpenSSF, npms.io, GitHub)
  • Read access to workspace lockfiles (pnpm-lock.yaml, package-lock., yarn.lock) for cache invalidation
Risks and side effects
  • Prompts, files, or audio may be sent to the selected AI provider; data handling depends on provider configuration
  • writeFile and external MCP tools may modify data or trigger external actions
  • Invalid credentials, rate limits, or provider outages can cause requests to fail
  • Tokens and permission scopes for external MCP servers affect the security boundary
  • Audio, video, and large-context processing may require additional dependencies or resources
  • Third-party READMEs and changelogs are untrusted external content; they are wrapped in tags with _meta flags but should still be handled cautiously
  • Depends on availability and accuracy of external services
  • Batch requests are capped at 25 packages to prevent registry enumeration; larger sets require batching
  • Third-party open source project, not officially maintained by NPM or Anthropic
Supported clientsClaude Desktop, VS Code, Cursor
Tools619