← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

Dimensionoh-my-openagentMulti-agent coding harness for complex codebases, spanning OpenCode and Codex CLIMartinLoop MCP ServerAn independent control layer that gives AI coding agents budgets, brakes, and receipts
FMRS52 / 100 · D79 / 100 · B
Reliability7 / 2012 / 20
Security and permissions9 / 2018 / 20
Maintenance14 / 2016 / 20
Documentation13 / 2018 / 20
Setup experience9 / 2015 / 20
Best for
  • Developers already on OpenCode or Codex CLI who want multi-model agent orchestration
  • Teams wanting automated hierarchical AGENTS.md generation and project rule injection
  • Users comfortable granting an agent broad autonomous edit/execution permissions for speed
  • Engineering teams scaling AI coding agents while controlling spend
  • Platform teams that need auditable, rollback-aware agent execution records
  • Organizations using multiple agents (Claude, Codex, Gemini) under one governed flow
Not for
  • Users who want a small, single-purpose MCP tool server with a minimal attack surface
  • Workflows requiring strict human review of every file edit or command before it runs
  • Projects requiring vendor-official support rather than a community-maintained plugin
  • Users not running OpenCode or Codex CLI as their agent host
  • Developers who just want a simple code-completion helper without run governance
  • Teams unwilling to accept local JSONL run records with HMAC signing
  • Environments without a supported adapter (Claude/Codex/Gemini CLIs, direct provider, or verifier-only)
Required permissions
  • Read/write access to the project codebase (for autonomous code edits)
  • Ability to execute shell/terminal commands (tmux integration, git-bash component)
  • Network access for bundled MCPs (Exa web search, Context7 docs, grep_app GitHub search)
  • API keys/subscription auth for multiple LLM providers (Anthropic, OpenAI, Kimi, GLM, Gemini, Copilot, etc.)
  • For the Codex Light edition, write access to `~/.codex/` config, plugin cache directories, and `~/.local/bin`
  • Read/write access to the configured repo root (writable scope restrictable via --allow-path/--deny-path)
  • Ability to invoke the chosen agent CLI (Claude/Codex/Gemini, etc.) and its underlying model account
  • Local disk writes for run records, receipts, and share outputs (share/run-receipt., etc.)
  • Execution of user-configured verifier commands (e.g. npm test)
Risks and side effects
  • Agents have broad autonomous file-edit and command-execution permissions; `ultrawork` mode does not stop until it decides the task is complete, risking large unreviewed changes
  • The Codex Light installer offers a `--codex-autonomous` full-permissions mode that removes command-confirmation gating
  • Anonymous telemetry (hashed machine ID, at most once per day) is enabled by default and must be manually opted out
  • Third-party community project; the README notes an in-progress multi-harness refactor, so behavior may shift between versions
  • Requires credentials/subscriptions from multiple third-party model providers, expanding the credential surface
  • The `omo` bin alias collides with an unrelated third-party npm package, risking accidental installation of the wrong tool
  • Verifier commands are executed; poorly chosen verifier commands carry security risk despite preflight policy checks
  • Cost and token figures may be estimates (labeled with provenance) and should not be treated as settled accounting
  • Receipt integrity must be verified before use as trustworthy evidence; missing rollback evidence is flagged as EVIDENCE_BOUNDARY
  • Policy defaults come from martin.config.yaml and can be overridden by CLI flags; misconfiguration can loosen safety boundaries
Supported clientsOpenCode, CodexClaude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, VS Code, GitHub Copilot, Continue
Tools80