M
MCP Directory CURATED DIRECTORY
911 MCP servers indexed
中文
← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionPlaywright MCPGive AI agents full browser control via structured accessibility snapshotsChrome DevTools MCPThe Chrome team's official MCP server exposing Chrome DevTools capabilities to AI assistants
FMRS43 / 100 · D76 / 100 · B
Reliability3 / 2013 / 20
Security and permissions8 / 2012 / 20
Maintenance17 / 2017 / 20
Documentation9 / 2017 / 20
Setup experience6 / 2017 / 20
Best for
  • Users who want an LLM to drive open-ended browser tasks
  • Developers already using MCP-capable clients like Claude Desktop, VS Code, Cursor, or Windsurf
  • Cross-browser (Chromium/Firefox/WebKit) automation without hand-writing test scripts
  • Frontend developers who want AI-assisted web debugging and performance analysis
  • Scenarios that need browser automation and performance diagnostics in the same tool
Not for
  • Teams needing a full end-to-end test runner with parallel execution and trace viewer — the README points to Playwright Test for that instead
  • Coding-agent setups that prioritize token efficiency and want to avoid loading large tool schemas and accessibility trees — the README recommends the lighter-weight Playwright CLI for that case
  • Environments requiring strict isolation from real browser sessions, cookies, or local files, since the agent gets genuine browser control
  • Cases that only need to scrape page text without performance analysis or complex interaction (a lighter scraping tool is a better fit)
Required permissions
  • Local Node.js/npx runtime to launch the server process
  • Ability to download and run Chromium/Firefox/WebKit browser binaries
  • Outbound network access to load whatever pages the agent is directed to visit
  • Requires a local Chrome browser instance to run
  • navigate_page can visit any URL; type_text/fill_form and similar tools can enter arbitrary content into the page
Risks and side effects
  • The server grants agents real control of a browser, so a manipulated prompt could cause navigation to or submission of data on unintended sites
  • If a saved storage state (login session) is loaded, the agent may gain access to authenticated account data
  • The README does not describe any authentication or access-control mechanism built into the MCP server itself — safety depends on the host client and how target URLs are constrained
  • Browser automation tools can access and manipulate the content of open pages — use only in a trusted development/test environment
  • performance_start_trace and similar tracing tools continuously record browser activity — avoid leaving them running on pages containing sensitive information
Supported clientsClaude Desktop, Claude Code, VS Code, Cursor, WindsurfClaude Code, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains IDEs, Cline, Amp, Kiro, Antigravity
Tools022