M
MCP Directory CURATED DIRECTORY
911 MCP servers indexed
中文
← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionT3MP3ST MCP ServerA multi-agent red-teaming platform for authorized security testing.GitHub MCP ServerGitHub's official MCP server for managing repos, issues, PRs, and workflows via natural language
FMRS51 / 100 · D76 / 100 · B
Reliability8 / 2013 / 20
Security and permissions5 / 2014 / 20
Maintenance12 / 2018 / 20
Documentation15 / 2017 / 20
Setup experience11 / 2014 / 20
Best for
  • Security teams operating under written authorization and defined rules of engagement
  • Red-team researchers and security educators
  • MCP users able to manage a local Node.js environment
  • Teams that want an AI assistant to directly operate on GitHub repos and collaboration workflows
  • Users already in the GitHub Copilot ecosystem who want a zero-deployment remote option
Not for
  • Targets without explicit written permission
  • Users seeking unrestricted remote scanning or execution
  • Users expecting fully validated end-to-end multi-agent exploitation
  • Scenarios where you don't want the assistant to have write access to repos (enable only read-only toolsets)
  • Environments with strict network isolation for private repos that can't reach the official remote endpoint
Required permissions
  • Access to network and security-testing resources within the authorized scope
  • A local Node.js environment, installed dependencies, and any configured agent or model access
  • The supplied material does not specify MCP-client permissions or authentication
  • A personal access token (PAT) or OAuth App token; effective scope depends on the token's own permissions
  • Enabling toolsets like actions/issues/pull_requests grants write access — request tokens on a least-privilege basis
Risks and side effects
  • This is an offensive-security tool and must be used only against owned or explicitly authorized systems
  • Incorrect scoping may cause unauthorized access, data loss, or legal exposure
  • The README says coordinated multi-agent exploitation remains unproven and unreliable
  • External security tools and optional arsenal components may affect targets
  • Write toolsets (creating/merging PRs, triggering workflows) can cause accidental changes if the token is overscoped — try a read-only toolset first
  • In hosted mode, credentials travel via the Authorization header — make sure the client-to-api.githubcopilot.com connection is trusted
Supported clientsClaude Desktop, Claude Code, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains IDEs, Zed, Amp
Tools115