- Reliability 9/20
- The manifest declares stdio packages, proxy modes, and a coherent tool set, making the normal path plausible from static evidence. However, versions, download URLs, and hashes are generated placeholders, and the supplied material contains no CI, committed tests, initialization-handshake evidence, or diagnosable error behavior. Points are deducted, and the static-review ceiling of 12 is respected.
- Security and permissions 8/20
- Destructive start and stop operations are disabled by default and require an explicit allow-destructive setting, which is positive permission evidence. However, the server can access cluster-wide traffic, headers, bodies, PCAPs, and decrypted TLS data; the manifest does not document authentication, authorization, data scoping, sensitive-data protection, or access controls for direct URLs. This leaves substantial data-boundary and least-privilege gaps, but no stated red-line condition is established.
- Maintenance 11/20
- The repository is marked unarchived and identifies Kubeshark as the maintainer, provides an Apache-2.0 license, release access, and contribution guidance. These are useful maintenance signals. The supplied sources do not establish commit cadence, release history, dependency-update practice, vulnerability response, or a security contact, so a high score is not justified.
- Documentation 12/20
- The README provides Helm, Homebrew, and binary installation paths, MCP connection instructions, capability descriptions, example questions, protocol coverage, and links to supporting documentation. It does not provide per-tool parameters and limits, authentication details, resource costs, troubleshooting, permission boundaries, or guidance for handling sensitive traffic, so completeness is reduced.
- Setup experience 12/20
- The main path from installing via Helm or Homebrew to connecting through kubectl port-forward is reasonably clear, and the manifest describes URL and proxy modes plus several platforms. Use still depends on Kubernetes, kubectl, kubeconfig access, and an existing deployment; package URLs contain X.Y.Z placeholders, and no complete mainstream-client configuration or verification flow is supplied. The score therefore remains moderate and below the static ceiling.