M
MCP Directory CURATED DIRECTORY
911 MCP servers indexed
中文
← Back to directory
COMPARE UP TO 4 SERVERS

Compare MCP servers

Compare scores, permissions, risks, and fit in one decision-focused table.

DimensionQuackbackOpen-source feedback platform. AI agents can search, triage, comment, vote, and manage changelogs.Notion MCP ServerOfficial Notion MCP server for querying, editing, and managing Notion pages and databases via AI agents.
FMRS39 / 100 · D64 / 100 · C
Reliability8 / 208 / 20
Security and permissions4 / 2017 / 20
Maintenance10 / 2010 / 20
Documentation8 / 2016 / 20
Setup experience9 / 2013 / 20
Best for
  • Teams using Quackback (self-hosted or cloud) who want AI agents to automate feedback management
  • Developers integrating feedback data with other tools like Jira or Slack
  • Customer support teams needing AI-assisted duplicate detection and theme summarization
  • Teams and individuals who already manage docs/wikis in Notion and want AI clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor, etc.) to operate on that content directly
  • Developers who want to self-host a local MCP server rather than use a remote hosted option
  • Automation/agent workflows that need to query or update Notion database records programmatically
Not for
  • Users without a deployed Quackback instance
  • Scenarios requiring non-HTTP transport (e.g., stdio or SSE)
  • Those seeking a full replacement rather than an integration with existing tools
  • Users who want the standard-OAuth, zero-JSON-config install with active official support — Notion recommends its newer remote Notion MCP server for that
  • Users uncomfortable handing a Notion integration token to a locally-run LLM client
  • Use cases needing capabilities the integration deliberately excludes, such as deleting databases
  • Long-term production deployments that need guaranteed maintenance, given this repo may be sunset
Required permissions
  • Read feedback posts, changelog entries, and comments
  • Create and edit feedback posts, changelogs, and comments
  • Manage post status, tags, owner, roadmap assignment, and merging
  • Add/remove comment reactions and votes
  • A Notion internal integration token (NOTION_TOKEN or the Authorization value in OPENAPI_MCP_HEADERS), scoped by that integration's Capabilities (can be limited to read-only)
  • Access limited to the specific pages/databases explicitly connected to the integration, not the whole workspace
  • A separate bearer auth token when using the Streamable HTTP transport (--auth-token / AUTH_TOKEN)
  • Network access to the Notion API
Risks and side effects
  • Sensitive customer feedback may be exposed if the instance uses weak authentication or is publicly accessible
  • Modifying post statuses or content may affect workflows, so use caution
  • Merging operations are irreversible (though unmerge_post exists, it may affect related data)
  • Self-hosted instances require maintenance and updates, otherwise security vulnerabilities may arise
  • If the integration is granted broad read/write capabilities and connected to many pages, that content is effectively exposed to the LLM, risking data leakage or unintended edits
  • Running with --unsafe-disable-auth removes bearer authentication on the HTTP transport, potentially making it reachable via DNS rebinding from pages a user visits — the README says to only use it on an isolated network
  • Multi-tenant token passthrough requires careful TLS/gateway configuration; misconfiguration risks leaking or misrouting Notion tokens between tenants
  • The README states this local server may be sunset in favor of the remote Notion MCP, and that issues/PRs here are not actively monitored, so long-term maintenance and security fixes are not guaranteed
  • Storing NOTION_TOKEN or OPENAPI_MCP_HEADERS directly in shared client config files risks leaking the secret
Supported clientsClaude DesktopClaude Desktop, Cursor, Zed, GitHub Copilot CLI
Tools159