This server focuses on gaming 3D development with specialized tools, suitable for game development scenarios. However, it is limited to the gaming domain and requires user installation and validation.
Strongest · Maintenance 8/20
Weakest · Reliability 4/20
Security and permissions
5/20
Why each score
- Reliability 4/20
- Evidence: only the manifest and a single README table row were supplied; no source, tests, or CI configuration for the gaming-3d server. The manifest is well-formed and internally consistent (name io.github.sceneview/gaming-3d, npm package [email protected], stdio transport), but the README's claimed 7 tools cannot be verified, and repo-wide CI/tool claims in the README must not be attributed to this server. Deduction: zero execution evidence; the init/tool-list handshake, tool/behavior matching, and error handling are unknowable. Per static calibration, reliability caps at 12 without real CI plus committed tests; uncertainty lowers the score.
- Security and permissions 5/20
- Evidence: no red-line issue is present in the supplied material — no malware, credential theft, covert exfiltration, or real tokens in install examples (the gaming install command is a bare `npx gaming-3d-mcp`), and transport is stdio. Deduction: for this server specifically there is no evidence about credential handling, least-privilege design, external network usage, data boundaries, or confirmation of dangerous operations; the source was not provided, so most of the security surface is unknowable. Missing evidence lowers the score; 0-4 is not applied because no red line is triggered.
- Maintenance 8/20
- Evidence: repository is not archived, has a clear Apache-2.0 license, the manifest declares version 1.0.0, and the README references a changelog/contributing and shows a CI badge (README claims are untrusted). These are repo-level signs of life. Deduction: nothing is verifiable at the gaming-3d package level — commits, release cadence, issue-response quality (72 open issues unexplained), and dependency updates cannot be confirmed from the supplied material, so the score reflects repo activity minus unverifiable package-level governance.
- Documentation 4/20
- Evidence: the gaming server's documentation consists of one README table row (domain description, `npx gaming-3d-mcp` install command, 7 tools) plus a one-sentence manifest description; no contradiction with capability was found. Deduction: there are no per-tool parameter docs, auth requirements, limits, troubleshooting guidance, or examples for this server, and the linked ./mcp/README.md was not provided. The documentation layer is minimally usable at best.
- Setup experience 7/20
- Evidence: the install path is simple and conventional — a single npm package ([email protected]) via stdio/npx, consistent with the manifest package identifier. Deduction: the supplied material contains no client configuration example specific to this server (the README's JSON config targets the sibling sceneview-mcp server and cannot be attributed here), no Node version/platform compatibility notes, and no verifiable execution evidence (no CI/tests). Per calibration, setup cannot approach 15+ without such evidence.
Static review · not runListed 2026-08-07
Read the FMRS scoring method →